The Secret of Successful Royal Marriage? History Says it's a MistressRoundup
tags: European history, history of sexuality
Dr Kate Lister is a university lecturer, a writer, blogger, and curates the online research project Whores of Yore - a digital public engagement project that works to make research on sexuality and the history of sex work accessible to the public. Kate is a campaigner for sex worker rights and is a board member for the sex work research hub and the Vagina Museum. In 2017, Kate won the Sexual Freedom Award, Publicist of the Year.
There is nothing quite like a royal wedding, is there? The pomp and ceremony are surely enough to bring a tear to even the most cynical of eyes. A royal marriage, on the other hand, is a different beast altogether. And we are witness to quite an extraordinary historical shift in royal marriages – we are now seeing royals marry because they actually like each other.
For thousands of years, love had very little to do with royalty marrying. When the monarchy held absolute power over a nation, a marriage was more of a business arrangement than any kind of act of personal devotion. A marriage could secure alliances with foreign powers, replenish the royal coffers, and, of course, secure the dynasty by supplying legitimate offspring. Whether or not the bride and groom actually liked each other was neither here nor there.
But that didn’t mean the king and queen were expected to live loveless lives, far from it. So, what was the secret to a royal marriage? The answer to that is sex, with as many different people as possible – for the king, at least. This situation created one of the most important and coveted positions in the Royal Court, the royal mistress. It was the mistress who was expected to tend to the king’s romantic and sexual needs. The queen was expected to produce children, support the king, and patronise the arts, if she had the time.
Whereas today, any royal infidelities would be conducted (hopefully) with some discretion, the royal mistress was once an official position at court, and a highly competitive one at that. Agnès Sorel (1422-50) was the first woman to be officially recognised as the royal mistress of France in 1444. She was often painted with one boob out, leading some to suggest this was the fashion at the time. The jury is still out on that one, but she was certainly was the lover of King Charles VII and his decision to elevate her to the status of maîtresse-en-titre, and create a new role for women at court, forever changed what was expected in a royal marriage.
The practice was soon adopted throughout the royal courts of Europe and quickly became an expected, even fashionable custom. So much so that Frederick I of Prussia (1657-1713) appointed Catharina von Wartenberg (1674-1734) as his official mistress, but they never actually had sex. By all accounts, Frederick really did love his wife but was concerned his sexual prowess would be questioned if he didn’t also keep a mistress. So, Catharina got the money and the titles, and was required to play along and regularly appear in public as the royal mistress, but never had to kick up her heels in service of the King. Nice work if you can get it.
comments powered by Disqus
- The Debt Ceiling Law is now a Tool of Partisan Political Power; Abolish It
- Amitai Etzioni, Theorist of Communitarianism, Dies at 94
- Kagan, Sotomayor Join SCOTUS Cons in Sticking it to Unions
- New Evidence: Rehnquist Pretty Much OK with Plessy v. Ferguson
- Ohio Unions Link Academic Freedom and the Freedom to Strike
- First Round of Obama Administration Oral Histories Focus on Political Fault Lines and Policy Tradeoffs
- The Tulsa Race Massacre was an Attack on Black People; Rebuilding Policies were an Attack on Black Wealth
- British Universities are Researching Ties to Slavery. Conservative Alumni Say "Enough"
- Martha Hodes Reconstructs Her Memory of a 1970 Hijacking
- Jeremi Suri: Texas Higher Ed Conflict "Doesn't Have to Be This Way"
- New transcript of Ayn Rand at West Point in 1974 shows she claimed “savage" Indians had no right to live here just because they were born here
- The Mexican War Suggests Ukraine May End Up Conceding Crimea. World War I Suggests the Price May Be Tragic if it Doesn't
- The Vietnam War Crimes You Never Heard Of