Indiana U. study compares Bill O'Reilly to '30s radio propagandist Father Coughlin
The IU researchers found that O'Reilly called a person or a group a derogatory name once every 6.8 seconds, on average, or nearly nine times every minute during the editorials that open his program each night...
For their article in the spring issue of Journalism Studies, Conway, Grabe and Kevin Grieves, a doctoral student in journalism, studied six months worth, or 115 episodes, of O'Reilly's "Talking Points Memo" editorials using propaganda analysis techniques made popular after World War I...
What the IU researchers found in their study, "Villains, Victims and Virtuous in Bill O'Reilly's 'No Spin Zone': Revisiting World War Propaganda Techniques," was that he was prone to inject fear into his commentaries and quick to resort to name-calling. He also frequently assigned roles or attributes -- such as "villians" or downright "evil" -- to people and groups...
Using analysis techniques first developed in the 1930s by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis, Conway, Grabe and Grieves found that O'Reilly employed six of the seven propaganda devices nearly 13 times each minute in his editorials...
The same techniques were used during the late 1930s to study another prominent voice in a war-era, Father Charles Coughlin [radio program ran 1926-39]. His sermons evolved into a darker message of anti-Semitism and fascism, and he became a defender of Hitler and Mussolini. In this study, O'Reilly is a heavier and less-nuanced user of the propaganda devices than Coughlin...
Related Links
"Villains, Victims and the Virtuous in Bill O'Reilly's 'No-Spin Zone': Revisiting World War propaganda techniques" (PDF, 27 pp) Table 1 - Comparison of Coughlin and O’Reilly on the frequency of using propaganda devices Between the wars: The radio priest (Center for History and New Media, GMU, with audio link)