With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Libya unhappy with U.S. reciprocation for halting weapons programs

When Libya gave up its nuclear and chemical weapons programs in late 2003, President George W. Bush pointed to the decision as a victory in Washington's so-called war on terror and as a potential model for pressing Iran and North Korea to give up their weapons programs, too.

But now Libyan officials say they are dissatisfied with the way the deal worked out, insisting that the United States has done too little to reward Libya's concessions. Officials here say they believe that Libya's limited payoff undermines the credibility of the United States as it presses other nations to abandon weapons programs.

Libya's discontent suggests the potential hurdles for the administration of President Barack Obama as it tries to engage with nations that the United States has shunned, like Iran and Syria, as part of a broader strategy reassessment in the Middle East.

While Libya says it does not plan to restart the weapons programs, its disaffection signals the need to manage expectations and reveals the unexpected challenges of developing relations with the former pariah state, which had been isolated for decades and remains run by an eccentric, enigmatic strongman, Muammar el-Qaddafi.

"We gave some devices, some centrifuges, for example, for America, but what do you give us? Nothing," said Abdelrahman Shalgham, who served as foreign minister for eight years before being named ambassador to the United Nations this month. "That's why we think North Korea and Iran are hesitating now to have a breakthrough regarding their projects."

Read entire article at International Herald Tribune