With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Good News for Humanities Funding?

In May 2021, the Biden administration requested a funding increase for the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and related programs, marking a welcome change from the previous administration’s yearly calls to eliminate the NEH and other sources of support for humanities scholarship. Each year of the Trump administration, the National Humanities Alliance (NHA)—a nonprofit, nonpartisan coalition working to research and communicate the value of the humanities to a range of audiences, including elected officials and the general public—mobilized the humanities community to cultivate bipartisan support in Congress and counter the administration’s threats. The legacy of these battles can be found in the lasting mobilization of the humanities community itself and the increased support for humanities funding in Congress.

Taking the Biden administration’s Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22) request as a starting point, humanities advocates are now poised to work toward even more ambitious goals. The president’s budget includes increases for nearly all humanities funding streams while ensuring that the humanities are tied to the administration’s overarching objectives, which include advancing racial equity and providing economic relief in the wake of COVID-19. Under the budget request, the NEH would receive $177.5 million, a $10 million increase. The NEH foregrounded the administration’s concerns throughout its budget justification, explaining that “the Administration’s priorities for NEH fall into five categories: advancing racial equity and support for underserved communities; confronting the climate emergency; restoring America’s global standing; responding to the COVID-19 pandemic and economic crisis; and strengthening our democracy.” 

The president’s budget allocates $403 million to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), an increase of $26 million, and $9.5 million to the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), an increase of $3 million. In its budget justification, the National Archives pledged to further racial equity by addressing “staffing needs across the agency and fund[ing] targeted recruitment activities to ensure a diverse pool of applicants.” Additionally, increased funding would “provide online, electronic access to one of NARA’s most prominent collections of US Government records associated with underserved communities.”

The budget request included only level funding for the Department of Education’s international education programs—Title VI and Fulbright-Hays—despite the crucial role these programs play in ensuring that institutions of higher education provide a robust curriculum in world cultures and languages. This was a disappointment. But good news arrived in June, and again in July, as the House released its appropriations bills and passed them out of committee. The House Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies bill contained an even more robust raise for the NEH, proposing an increase of $201 million.

Read entire article at Perspectives on History