With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Have You Got a Shot at Being Elected President? The 1 in 10 Million Odds (Or Worse)

Hillary Clinton is touring the country with her new book, Hard Choices, fueling speculation that she is preparing for a 2016 presidential bid. Instead of focusing on Terry Gross’ unusually controversial interview with the past Secretary of State, I began thinking about Hillary’s relationship to a previous American President and the odds of calling the White House “home” in the first place.

Given that there have only been 44 presidents in the past 225 years, and that the odds of dodging the mudslinging and moving into 1600 Penn are some 1 in 10 million – how can it be that so many American presidents are related to one another?

The most contemporary example, of course, is the father-son duo: George H.W. Bush (#41) and George W. Bush (#43). But it becomes even more trivial: John Adams (#2) and John Quincy Adams (#6) were the first father-son pair, soon to be followed by James Madison (#4) and his cousin Zachary Taylor (#12). Next up were William Henry Harrison (#9) and his grandson Benjamin Harrison (#23). Franklin D. Roosevelt (#32) was not only good ol’ Theodore Roosevelt’s (#26) cousin, but he was also related to George Washington (#1), John Adams (#2), James Madison (#4), John Quincy Adams (#6), Martin Van Buren (#8), William Henry Harrison (#9), Zachary Taylor (#12), Ulysses Grant (#18), Benjamin Harrison (#23), and William Taft (#27). Use that one at your pub’s next trivia night.

The 1 in 10 million odds are even more intimidating when you take these 14 executives out of the mix. The “People’s” House starts to look more like the family cottage.

In other words, we might be able to predict presidential victors based solely on genealogy. But that’s not all! We can get even more precise if we can determine whether any given presidential candidate has royal blood.

12-year old BridgeAnne d’Avignon of Salinas, California made genealogical news when she discovered that all but one president (none other than the wildly popular Martin Van Buren) were direct descendants of one man who signed the 1215 Magna Carta - King John of Great Britain. Many immediately claimed that only the Illumanati could be behind such a conspiracy. It’s more likely that the King had a vibrant “social” life and unknowingly became the Abraham of the American Presidency.

Much of this is said tongue-in-cheek as statistical predictions should be left to the seemingly prophetic Nate Silver. Nevertheless, there remains a nugget of truth to this political oddity. Hillary’s odds of winning the presidency by relationship to Bill Clinton (#42) not only exponentially increase her chances of winning, but her success will lessen the odds that YOU will ever be elected to the presidency. And let’s face it - you don’t have a right to take an heirloom away from the exclusive First Family.